What the Government and the Medical Establishment are Admitting about Vaccination

January 26th, 2010

I was doing some research on vaccination and discovered the website of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC, as their website states, is “a part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, [and] is the primary Federal agency for conducting and supporting public health activities in the United States.”

As I was browsing through their webpages, I came across information which I suspect most people are not aware of. I wanted to share this information, specifically with other parents who are faced with the same dilemma of “to vaccinate, or not to vaccinate.”

First of all, let’s discuss the ingredients of the common childhood vaccines.

According to a pdf list I found through CDC’s website, the vaccines doctors are giving your children include the following ingredients:

- Formaldehyde or Formalin

- Aluminum compounds

- Monkey Kidney Tissue

- Calf Serum Protein

- Bovine Albumin or Serum

- Chick Embryo Fibroblasts

- Thimerosal

In recent years, researchers have been labeling formaldehyde a carcinogen (cancer-causing agent). As for injecting children with foreign animal proteins, other researchers are speculating that this may possibly be interfering with or damaging their human genetic code.

But in regards to Thimerosal, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration admitted this:

“Thimerosal is a mercury-containing organic compound (an organomercurial). Since the 1930s, it has been widely used as a preservative in a number of biological and drug products, including many vaccines, to help prevent potentially life threatening contamination with harmful microbes. Over the past several years, because of an increasing awareness of the theoretical potential for neurotoxicity of even low levels of organomercurials and because of the increased number of thimerosal containing vaccines that had been added to the infant immunization schedule, concerns about the use of thimerosal in vaccines and other products have been raised. Indeed, because of these concerns, the Food and Drug Administration has worked with, and continues to work with, vaccine manufacturers to reduce or eliminate thimerosal from vaccines.” (Emphasis mine).

What does this mean? This means that Thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative used in your baby’s vaccine, is toxic to your baby’s nervous system and brain.

What severe reactions can the ingredients in these vaccines cause in your child? The CDC website had an entire page devoted to the possible side effects of vaccines. Here are just two of the common childhood vaccines and the possible side effects:

DTaP (Dipheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis vaccine) – Moderate to Severe Reactions

  • Seizure (jerking or staring) (about 1 child out of 14,000)
  • Non-stop crying, for 3 hours or more (up to about 1 child out of 1,000)
  • High fever, 105 degrees Fahrenheit or higher (about 1 child out of 16,000)
  • Long-term seizures, coma, or lowered consciousness
  • Permanent brain damage.

MMR (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella vaccine) – Severe Reactions

  • Deafness
  • Long-term seizures, coma, or lowered consciousness
  • Permanent brain damage

The CDC website claims that severe reactions only occur in the case of one out of a million vaccinations. The Health Canada website claimed that severe reactions occurred in the case of less than one in a million vaccinations. However, one source I read revealed that reporting a severe reaction is NOT mandatory in Canada. If this is true, then the accuracy of the statistics given is seriously questionable.

Many doctors and parents would insist that the vital role of vaccines in preventing serious diseases outweighs the risks of vaccine injury.  However, studies published in medical journals reveal that vaccines are not 100% effective in preventing disease.

Here are extracts from the abstract of an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1987:

An outbreak of measles occurred among adolescents in Corpus Christi, Texas, in the spring of 1985, even though vaccination requirements for school attendance had been thoroughly enforced. Serum samples from 1806 students at two secondary schools were obtained eight days after the onset of the first case. Only 4.1 percent of these students (74 of 1806) lacked detectable antibody to measles according to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and more than 99 percent had records of vaccination with live measles vaccine….We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune. (Emphasis mine).

More recently (1996) the Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases reported this:

Since 1991, 6 years after the recommendation of universal childhood triple vaccination against measles, mumps and rubella (M + M + R), Switzerland has been confronted with an increasing number of mumps cases affecting both vaccinated and unvaccinated children. The M + M + R vaccine mainly used in the Swiss population after 1986 contains the highly attenuated Rubini strain of mumps virus….Mumps was confirmed by virus isolation in 88 patients, of whom 72 had previously received the Rubini vaccine strain….These data support other recent reports which indicate an insufficient protective efficacy of current mumps vaccines. (Emphasis mine).

Of course, science is always improving. But who can say whether vaccines have been perfected yet? Furthermore, even if a child is inoculated against one strain of a certain disease, how will that protect him against another strain?

So one must conclude that a vaccinated person bears the risk both of a vaccine injury and of contracting the disease, whereas the unvaccinated person risks only the disease.

I would greatly encourage parents to become informed and make responsible, knowledgeable decisions about their child’s health and wellbeing. Educate yourself about the disease, the vaccine, and the risks of both before you make your choice. Also, check out the history of the disease and whether vaccination played a significant role in bringing down the fatality rates.

- Kristin

Christmas Newsletter 2009

December 17th, 2009

by Kristin

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!!

We hope this newsletter finds you all well.

We have been truly blessed by our gracious God again in 2009, having enjoyed health and strength, loving fellowship with one another, our daily provisions, and the coming of our precious son Justin.

In February, we celebrated our first Valentine’s day as a married couple. Being the unique couple that we are, we took a stroll through the aisles of Home Depot to mark the occasion. Memory fails me as to what we purchased, although Ryan could probably tell you.

The baby was due on March 6th, but by the end of February we were already impatient to see our little one. Thus you can understand our dismay when March 6th came and went. After a little over two weeks of anxious waiting, I went into labour early in the morning on Saturday, March 21st.  At approximately 5:30pm Justin Wilberforce Kidd was born, and we rejoiced to have been given a healthy baby boy.

Justin's Baptism


Justin was received into the Covenant Family of God through the sign and seal of baptism on March 29th. Ryan took two weeks paternity leave to help with running the house and caring for Justin while I recovered from the birth.

During the month of April, we were thrilled at the opportunity to get to know this new little person better and watch him grow. Determined to be good parents, we bundled Justin up and took him for his first bike ride in his baby bike trailer on April 13th.

In May, Justin helped with raising donations for the Pregnancy Care Centre Walk for Life, and was the youngest participant in the walk. He hitched a ride in his snuggly with Daddy. My graduation from the Philosophy B.A. Honours program at Tyndale University College took place the same weekend. Towards the end of the month, we celebrated our first wedding anniversary by going on a family bike ride and picnic in Sunnybrook Park followed by a stroll through Edwards Gardens.

First Anniversary


During the spring and summer, Ryan kept busy assembling and selling tandem bicycles. Justin spent many a happy hour watching his Daddy work on bicycles. I planted a variety of vegetables in my tiny plot of garden in the backyard and reaped a fairly good harvest.

On the Canada Day holiday, we went on a short bike tour of the Niagara region and saw the Brock Monument, the Arboretum, and the Niagara River and the Falls. We enjoyed dinner and a fireworks show with our friends, the Wells, and spent the night at their place.

In August we drove out to Ottawa to visit our friends the Zinks, and had a great time of fellowship. Our Justin and their little Heidi (who is only a few months older) enjoyed some happy playtime together.

In October we attended two different conferences. The first was the Deconstructing Darwin conference at Westminster Chapel, and the second was the Ignite the Culture conference organized by the ECP Centre. Both were excellent.

We enjoyed time with both families on Thanksgiving weekend, and went on a great hike on a section of the Bruce Trail.

Thanksgiving Weekend


At the end of October, we made the decision to upgrade our quarters, painting and renovating the main and second floors of our home on Shawnee Circle.   Most of November was spent cleaning out junk, painting the walls, re-finishing the floor, and doing other renovations to prepare the house for us to move in. We have now moved and are slowly settling in while we continue to finish the details.

As for Justin, he is a happy, content, and outgoing baby. He’s had a great year of growing and developing. Born weighing 6 lbs 9 oz. (3 kgs) and measuring 21 inches (53 cm), he now weighs over 20 lbs and measures almost 30 inches. He cut his first tooth when he was just four months old, and now boasts seven big chompers. He was sitting (with support) at about six and a half months, and in the past few weeks has started the combat crawl. He loves to play peek-a-boo and to kick his feet.   Justin’s favourite things include mommy’s milk, banana, tags, zippers, and paper.  With his Daddy’s help, Justin is well on his way to becoming a man’s man.

Justin's Saw

God is good and we continue to rest in His love toward us demonstrated in so many ways.

Blessings to you this Christmas from the Kidd Family,

Ryan, Kristin, & Justin

Worldviews in “Collision”

December 6th, 2009

by Kristin

Recently, we viewed the new “debatumentary” about Christopher Hitchens and Douglas Wilson’s tour around America. The two men debated the existence and goodness of God. Hitchens’ primary argument was that Christianity is “immoral”, and Wilson (craftily wielding the transcendental argument) challenged him to give a basis for his claim.

In my observation, Hitchens had difficulty in recognizing the paralyzing thrust of Wilson’s argument. An atheist can’t deny the existence of a Moral Lawgiver and an absolute moral law and then turn around and claim that the Christian’s belief in such goes against absolute moral law.

Let me explain using an illustration. Suppose Hitchens came up to me and told me that  Parliament doesn’t exist, that there are no lawmakers, judges, or policemen, and there is no Charter or Constitution — no law or enforcement of any kind.

“Is that so?” I said. “Well, I believe that all drivers should stop at red lights and stop signs.”

“It’s against the law to believe such a thing,” says Hitchens. “People like you are criminals and are poisoning the world.”

But hold on a second: Against what law? Hitchens just told me he doesn’t believe there are laws, lawmakers, or law enforcers. So what is he referring to? If there is no law, then on what is he basing his claim that my belief is “against the law”?  The answer is: Nothing. He has nothing to back him up. Hitchens’ claim is empty and meaningless.

The same goes with his argument against Christianity. He denies the existence of God (the Great Lawgiver and Judge) and by consequence the existence of God’s absolute moral law, and then he calls Christianity “immoral.” What does he have to back up that claim? Nothing. His argument is totally meaningless unless he can come up with an absolute moral law (other than God’s) which applies to all men equally across all cultures and history.

I think Wilson did an excellent job of keeping up the offensive and forcing Hitchens to defend his position. Wilson kept driving the point home that Hitchens had no ground to stand on, and hopefully — Lord willing — Hitchens will eventually come to see the fatal flaw in his atheism.

A ‘Face to Face’ Discussion on Holiness

September 30th, 2009

by Kristin

A friend of mine posted a question on Facebook, asking “What does it mean to ’strive for holiness’?

Here is the discussion that followed:

What does it mean to “strive for holiness”??

Kristin Kidd
Holiness means to be “set apart.” There should be an unmistakable difference between Christians and the world. We need to seek to be close to the heart of God, and because God is holy, this means we need to reject our sin, keep God’s law with a pure and right heart, and love as Jesus loved — sacrifice our selves for the good of others. (Not easy!)

J. T.
@Kristin, are Christians set apart *because* they follow a particular law or are Christians set apart *to* follow a particular law? What do you mean when you say we ought to “keep God’s law with a pure and right heart”? Which law? The Mosaic law? The Shema?

Kristin Kidd
@J. T., I’d say both, because I believe 1) that Christians are commanded to keep the law (John 14:15) and that we are known by our fruits (Matt. 7:17-20, Cf. book of James) and 2) that God is sovereign and that the Holy Spirit works in us, makes us new creations, and helps us to keep the law.
I said ‘pure and right heart’ to distinguish from the legalistic keeping of the law, which strains out gnats and swallows camels, and which neglects mercy and justice (Matt. 23:23-24).
If you ask me, the Shema is a summary of the Mosaic law (see Matt. 22:34-40). You have to distinguish between the ceremonial laws and the moral laws of the OT. The NT affirms the continued keeping of the moral law, but the ceremonial law (i.e. dietary laws, laws of animal sacrifices) were done away with through the once-for-all sacrifice of Jesus and the instructions to Peter (Acts 10).

J. T.
@Kristin, I think you’ve made some helpful distinctions, however, I’m not sure that in John 14:15 Jesus is commanding his followers to keep the moral law. “If you love me, you will obey what I command,” (Jn. 14:15, NIV). Jesus expands on this a few verses later: “My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you,” and again, “This is my command: Love each other,” (Jn. 15: 12, 17 respectively). This seems to be similar to the Shema.
The Shema as seen in Matt. seems to be more than just a “summary” of the Mosaic law, the words Jesus uses, particularly in verse 40 seem to suggest that the Shema is a *fulfillment* of the Mosaic law.

Kristin Kidd
@ J. T. , Re: Love and law. Love is the fulfillment of the law, but love is shown through actions. Paul explains this in Romans 13:8-10. You cannot separate love from actions.
For example, you can tell your wife you love her, but if you steal from her (i.e. break the 8th commandment) you are not showing love. Your breaking of the law demonstrates your lack of love.
It’s the same with Jesus’ commandments to love. Love means keeping the law.

[Postscript: Just to clarify. Love (and the Shema) is a fulfillment of the law in the sense which Paul is talking about in Romans 13: if you love your neighbour, you will "fulfill" the law toward them by not stealing from them, not killing them, and so on.]

Wives: You are not his conscience!

July 21st, 2009

by Kristin

In the past year, I have read a few good books on marriage and being a godly wife. One thing I came across which I thought was particularly applicable to the wives of today was the truth that we are not our husband’s conscience. God did not give wives to men for the purpose of convicting them of their sin and ridding them of all their bad habits. If He did, then you would expect a wife’s nagging and criticism would instantly transform a man because God would be working through it. But He isn’t, because that is the opposite of what He intended for husbands and wives.

At the beginning, when God was looking over His creation, He said: “It is not good that man should be alone; I will make him a helper comparable to him” (Genesis 2:18). Wives, God made us as a helper. Not a coach, not a prosecuting attorney, not a judge, but a helper. God’s created purpose for us was to lend our wholehearted support to our husband’s vision, his goals, his dreams (within the bounds of God’s law). This is how we ‘build up our house’ like a wise woman (Proverbs 14:1) and bring glory to God (Titus 2:4-5).

You may be tempted to think: “But if I don’t say anything or show him that he’s doing wrong, he’ll make pagans out of the kids with the stuff he’s letting them watch on TV,” or “he’ll keep getting us lost every time he drives us somewhere,” or “our house will look like a dump because he is too lazy to fix the screen door,” or “he’ll never do anything good, and he won’t grow as a spiritual leader.”

Consider this: No man has ever crawled out from under his wife’s criticism to achieve greatness.

Consider this: Your disrespect for your husband will ultimately be a greater destroyer of your children than his bad habits.

Consider this: You are interfering with God’s work in his life with your critical spirit. You are failing to be obedient to God yourself, and you are failing to trust God for the outcome.

If you want to change your husband, you must do it God’s way: “Wives, likewise, be submissive to your own husbands, that even if some do not obey the word, they, without a word, may be won by the conduct of their wives, when they observe your chaste conduct accompanied by fear” (I Peter 3:1-2).

Be submissive. Be respectful. Trust God and obey Him.

Be encouraging. Encouragement is by far a better motivator of men than criticism is.

Be loving. Be supportive. Make your home a haven for your man, not a battle zone or a courtroom.

Justin’s Corner

April 14th, 2009

For more photos of Justin, view our

Picasa Web Album

We will attempt to update this web album periodically with new photos of our growing boy.

Baptism Photos

March 30th, 2009

It was a joyous occasion with many friends and relatives in attendance as Justin was formally entered into the promises and oaths of covenant with our God.

Glad Tidings: A son is born

March 21st, 2009

Justin March 22

With deepest joy and gratitude to God for the safe arrival

of our precious baby,

we would like to announce the birth of our first son,

Justin Wilberforce Kidd

born at 5:33 pm on Saturday, March 21, 2009

weighing 6 lbs. 9oz. (3.0kg)


The Baptism:

Justin will be baptized at

2:30pm, on Sunday, March 29, 2009

at the New Horizon Church in Scarborough.

See www.newhorizonchurch.ca/map for directions.

Everyone is welcome to attend.

There will be a time of refreshments after the service.


Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What are Justin’s birth specifications? A: weight: 6 lb. 9 oz. (3.0kg);  length: 21inches (53cm), brown hair, brown eyes (for now), no major birth marks.
  2. How long was Kristin’s labour? A: 15 hours total, 8 hours active labour.
  3. Were there any complications? A: Nothing but a minor internal tear.  Praise the Lord!
  4. Where was the birth? A: Justin was born in 18 inches of warm water (birth pool) in our dining room attended by midwives.
  5. How is breastfeeding? A: As of day two (March 23rd) Justin has had a few pretty good feeds, and is latching properly at times, but he’s still more sleepy than hungry.
  6. Why did you name him Justin Wilberforce?  A:  Justin means “just” and we want him to become a man of boldness and tenacity like William Wilberforce (see the movie Amazing Grace) to reverse today’s social evils such as abortion.
  7. What’s Justin’s theme verse? A: Micah 6:8 He has shown you, O man, what is good; And what does the LORD require of you  But to do justly, To love mercy, And to walk humbly with your God? (New King James Version)
  8. Why are you choosing to baptize your baby? A: We do not believe baptism will make the baby go to heaven automatically.  But just as male babies received the covenant sign of circumcision in the Old Testament, we believe that God requires us to put His mark of ownership on our children, and in baptism He promises to save our children if they grow up to repent of their sins personally and to love and obey the Lord Jesus.
  9. Do you need meals or anything for the baby? A:  We have received so much and are abundantly supplied with pre-cooked meals and baby things.    At this point, you might consider sending a gift to the Christian Blind Mission in honour of Justin’s birth.   CBMI provides eye operations and life saving treatments to children in the third world who are truly in need.  Donate Online Thank you all for your love and prayers for us at this precious time!

Jed is almost here…

March 20th, 2009

Here’s a Photo of us from March 7th.

March 7, 2009

Delayed Arrival

March 10th, 2009

Friends and family have been staking their bets, making predictions as to when our little baby (fondly nicknamed ‘Jed’) will arrive, but there have been no signs yet. Already our little one is 4 days past his/her due date, and a few of our friends and family have been forced to change their prediction to a later day.

This amusing situation reminds me of a scene from the movie “Airplane.” For those of you who have not seen it, the movie is basically a spoof off of a number of films. The general plot involves a passenger plane which suddenly experiences several cases of food poisoning, the pilot and co-pilot being among the victims. A psychologically traumatized fighter pilot who happens to be onboard is called upon to fly and attempt to land the aircraft at the destined airport. He eventually consents, and as he brings the plane careening down the runway, it rolls past its docking bay where a crowd of passengers is waiting to board. The announcement is made over the airport intercom that the plane is now stopping at “docking bay number 21…number 22…number 23…number 24.” The waiting passengers climb to their feet, looking confused, and begin moving from docking bay to docking bay with their luggage, eventually running through the airport trying to keep up with the arriving plane.

In similar fashion, it seems the our little one is forcing everyone to move from one day to the next in their predictions. Rather comical, if you ask me. :)